Sunday, March 14, 2010

Social Security to start cashing Uncle Sam's IOUs

Original Post: Yahoo
By: STEPHEN OHLEMACHER Associated Press

PARKERSBURG, W.Va. – The retirement nest egg of an entire generation is stashed away in this small town along the Ohio River: $2.5 trillion in IOUs from the federal government, payable to the Social Security Administration.

It's time to start cashing them in.

For more than two decades, Social Security collected more money in payroll taxes than it paid out in benefits — billions more each year.

Not anymore. This year, for the first time since the 1980s, when Congress last overhauled Social Security, the retirement program is projected to pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes — nearly $29 billion more.

Sounds like a good time to start tapping the nest egg. Too bad the federal government already spent that money over the years on other programs, preferring to borrow from Social Security rather than foreign creditors. In return, the Treasury Department issued a stack of IOUs — in the form of Treasury bonds — which are kept in a nondescript office building just down the street from Parkersburg's municipal offices.

Now the government will have to borrow even more money, much of it abroad, to start paying back the IOUs, and the timing couldn't be worse. The government is projected to post a record $1.5 trillion budget deficit this year, followed by trillion dollar deficits for years to come.

Social Security's shortfall will not affect current benefits. As long as the IOUs last, benefits will keep flowing. But experts say it is a warning sign that the program's finances are deteriorating. Social Security is projected to drain its trust funds by 2037 unless Congress acts, and there's concern that the looming crisis will lead to reduced benefits.

"This is not just a wake-up call, this is it. We're here," said Mary Johnson, a policy analyst with The Senior Citizens League, an advocacy group. "We are not going to be able to put it off any more."

For more than two decades, regardless of which political party was in power, Congress has been accused of raiding the Social Security trust funds to pay for other programs, masking the size of the budget deficit.

Remember Al Gore's "lockbox," the one he was going to use to protect Social Security? The former vice president talked about it so much during the 2000 presidential campaign that he was parodied on "Saturday Night Live."

Gore lost the election and never got his lockbox. But to illustrate the government's commitment to repaying Social Security, the Treasury Department has been issuing special bonds that earn interest for the retirement program. The bonds are unique because they are actually printed on paper, while other government bonds exist only in electronic form.

They are stored in a three-ring binder, locked in the bottom drawer of a white metal filing cabinet in the Parkersburg offices of Bureau of Public Debt. The agency, which is part of the Treasury Department, opened offices in Parkersburg in the 1950s as part of a plan to locate important government functions away from Washington, D.C., in case of an attack during the Cold War.

One bond is worth a little more than $15.1 billion and another is valued at just under $10.7 billion. In all, the agency has about $2.5 trillion in bonds, all backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. But don't bother trying to steal them; they're nonnegotiable, which means they are worthless on the open market.

More than 52 million people receive old age or disability benefits from Social Security. The average benefit for retirees is a little under $1,200 a month. Disabled workers get an average of $1,100 a month.

Social Security is financed by payroll taxes — employers and employees must each pay a 6.2 percent tax on workers' earnings up to $106,800. Retirees can start getting early, reduced benefits at age 62. They get full benefits if they wait until they turn 66. Those born after 1960 will have to wait until they turn 67.

Social Security's financial problems have been looming for years as the nation's 78 million baby boomers approached retirement age. The oldest are already there. As that huge group of people starts collecting benefits — and stops paying payroll taxes — Social Security's trust funds will shrink, running out of money by 2037, according to the latest projection from the trustees who oversee the program.

The recession is making things worse, at least in the short term. Tax receipts are down from the loss of more than 8 million jobs, and applications for early retirement benefits have spiked from older workers who were laid off and forced to retire.

Stephen C. Goss, chief actuary for the Social Security Administration, says the crisis has been years in the making. "If this helps get people to look more seriously at that in the nearer term, that's probably a good thing. But it's only really a punctuation mark on the fact that we have longer-term financial issues that need to be addressed."

In the short term, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that Social Security will continue to pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes for the next three years. It is projected to post small surpluses of $6 billion each in 2014 and 2015, before returning to indefinite deficits in 2016.

For the budget year that ends in September, Social Security is projected to collect $677 million in taxes and spend $706 million on benefits and expenses.

Social Security will also collect about $120 billion in interest on the trust funds, according to the CBO projections, meaning its overall balance sheet will continue to grow. The interest, however, is paid by the government, adding even more to the budget deficit.

While Congress must shore up the program, action is unlikely this year, said Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-N.D., who just took over last week as chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees Social Security.

"The issues required to address the long-term solvency needs of Social Security can be done in a careful, thoughtful and orderly way and they don't need to be done in the next few months," Pomeroy said.

The national debt — the amount of money the government owes its creditors — is about $12.5 trillion, or nearly $42,000 for every man, woman and child in the country. About $8 trillion has been borrowed in public debt markets, much of it from foreign creditors. The rest came from various government trust funds, including retirement funds for civil servants and the military. About $2.5 trillion is owed to Social Security.

Good luck to the politician who reneges on that debt, said Barbara Kennelly, a former Democratic congresswoman from Connecticut who is now president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.

"Those bonds are protected by the full faith and credit of the United States of America," Kennelly said. "They're as solid as what we owe China and Japan."

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Reagan vs. Obama



Wow. 'nuff said.

In regards to Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction

Bill Clinton



So people thought that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq before Bush took office. Well, this can only lead me to one conclusion. Bush summoned Satan (probably in the summoning chamber in Haliburton) and sacrificed an infant for a time machine to go back during Clinton's administration and trick him into thinking that there were weapons of mass destruction here.

I wish an ironic tone was more apparent in text format.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Obama is too dumb to buy insurance



His story doesn't make any sense. First of all Obama has never had a "beater" he just didn't. Second, he said he was rear-ended. Well if he wasn't at fault, then the other driver's insurance would have paid for the repairs.

But this story leads me to one of two conclusions. Either he's just lying. Or our illustrious leader looked at his insurance policy and said, "Hmmmm this costs money and I don't get anything in return and they don't cover accidents? Well sign me up, that's a great idea."

I realize that Obama is too dumb to figure out how insurance works and he wants to control the content of insurance policies because he not only thinks that we're as dumb as he is, but presumably dumber because we need his help in buying an insurance policy that does...stuff.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Health Care Summit





I watched* the Health Care Summit. I noticed something very peculiar. Most of the Democrat speakers had letters written to them by their constituents. It seems that Democrat constitutions have a very strange way of speaking. For example after a farmer's health insurance increased, he gave the percentage of increase "for an average family of four".

That's a bizarre thing to say. I may say, "My electrical bill went up 30% this month." But I can't picture myself saying, "My electrical bill went up 30% this month for an average person of one." And then going on to give how this impacts the economics of my neighborhood.

Also, I learned that Democrat constituents are cry babies. I mean literally. Nancy Pelosi and several other Democrat speakers started with, "so-and-so came to me with tears in their eyes" "he was crying" "began crying" and so on. Really? I've spoken to a few Representatives of mine and others from outside my district. I've never broken down into tears before pleading my point, even on issues for which I'm very passionate. Come to think of it, I don't recall anyone else breaking down into tears at the mere presence of a Congressman.






Typical Democrat Constituant according to Nancy Pelosi

*with watched being defined as watching a bit, listening to most of it.

Before Gore

Original Post: Washington Times

D.C. resident John Lockwood was conducting research at the Library of Congress and came across an intriguing Page 2 headline in the Nov. 2, 1922 edition of The Washington Post: "Arctic Ocean Getting Warm; Seals Vanish and Icebergs Melt."

The 1922 article, obtained by Inside the Beltway, goes on to mention "great masses of ice have now been replaced by moraines of earth and stones," and "at many points well-known glaciers have entirely disappeared."

"This was one of several such articles I have found at the Library of Congress for the 1920s and 1930s," says Mr. Lockwood. "I had read of the just-released NASA estimates, that four of the 10 hottest years in the U.S. were actually in the 1930s, with 1934 the hottest of all."

Worth pondering

Reacting yesterday to word that certain European governments and officials are suddenly trying to abandon their costly "global warming" policies, Royal Astronomical Society fellow Benny Peiser, of the science faculty at Liverpool John Moores University in Great Britain, recalls the teachings of Marcus Aurelius: "The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."

Pelosi thinks she's in the TEA party?

Nancy Pelosi said she shares a lot of views with the TEA party.



She thinks the TEA party is violent


That it's astroturf.
That they're neo-Nazis.
That they're terrorists.
That they're secessionists.
That they're racists.
weekly standard

Well, this get's the gears grinding. Now I wouldn't want to impune Speaker Pelosi's integrity because she's clearly an intelligent, truthful, wise woman who wouldn't lie (I know I couldn't get through typing it with a straight face either). So, taking her at her word and accepting the fact that TEA party attendants are:astroturf, neo-Nazi, terrorist, secessionistst, racists with which Nacy "shares a lot of views" this leads me to a very important question. Which one is she?